## Skipping install of 'urbnmapr' from a github remote, the SHA1 (ef9f4488) has not changed since last install.
## Use `force = TRUE` to force installation
##
|
| | 0%
|
|= | 1%
|
|= | 2%
|
|== | 3%
|
|===== | 7%
|
|========== | 14%
|
|================= | 25%
|
|================== | 26%
|
|============================== | 42%
|
|======================================== | 57%
|
|========================================== | 60%
|
|============================================ | 63%
|
|=================================================== | 73%
|
|==================================================== | 74%
|
|=============================================================== | 91%
|
|================================================================ | 91%
|
|======================================================================| 100%
In my opinion, I’d more prefer density map and state level choropleth map that provide a better visual to understand how the impact of severe weather. For county level, it is too disorder and unable to present the distribution with colors. I think density map create a better comparation that i had two maps one focus on the death related to severe event and another on focus on the injury related to severe event, it allows readers to better observe how the severe event impact each state varies by impact either death or injury with the percentile range.